Question
I am looking to find a clear explanation of what the "this" keyword does, and how to use it correctly.
It seems to behave strangely, and I don't fully understand why.
How does this
work and when should it be used?
Answer
this
is a keyword in JavaScript that is a property of an execution context. Its
main use is in functions and constructors. The rules for this
are quite
simple (if you stick to best practices).
Technical description of this
in the specification
The ECMAScript standard defines
this
via the abstract operation
(abbreviated AO ) [ResolveThisBinding](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
resolvethisbinding):
The [AO] ResolveThisBinding […] determines the binding of the keyword
this
using the LexicalEnvironment of the running execution context. [Steps]:
- Let envRec be [GetThisEnvironment](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec- getthisenvironment)().
- Return ? envRec.GetThisBinding().
[Global Environment Records](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-global-environment- records), [module Environment Records](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module- environment-records), and function Environment Records each have their own GetThisBinding method.
The GetThisEnvironment AO finds the current [running execution context](//tc39.es/ecma262/#running-execution- context)’s LexicalEnvironment and finds the closest ascendant Environment Record (by iteratively accessing their [[OuterEnv]] properties) which has a this binding (i.e. HasThisBinding returns true ). This process ends in one of the three Environment Record types.
The value of this
often depends on whether code is in strict
mode.
The return value of GetThisBinding reflects the value of this
of the current
execution context, so whenever a new execution context is established, this
resolves to a distinct value. This can also happen when the current execution
context is modified. The following subsections list the five cases where this
can happen.
You can put the code samples in the AST explorer to follow along with specification details.
1. Global execution context in scripts
This is script code evaluated at the top level, e.g. directly inside a
<script>
:
<script>
// Global context
console.log(this); // Logs global object.
setTimeout(function(){
console.log("Not global context");
});
</script>
When in the initial global execution context of a script, evaluating this
causes [GetThisBinding](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-global-environment-records-
getthisbinding) to take the following steps:
The GetThisBinding concrete method of a global Environment Record envRec […] [does this]:
- Return envRec.[[GlobalThisValue]].
The [[GlobalThisValue]] property of a global Environment Record is always set
to the host-defined global object,
which is reachable via globalThis
(window
on Web, global
on Node.js; Docs on
MDN).
Follow the steps of [InitializeHostDefinedRealm](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
initializehostdefinedrealm) to learn how the [[GlobalThisValue]] property
comes to be.
2. Global execution context in
Modules have been introduced in ECMAScript 2015.
This applies to modules, e.g. when directly inside a <script type="module">
,
as opposed to a simple <script>
.
When in the initial global execution context of a module, evaluating this
causes [GetThisBinding](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-environment-records-
getthisbinding) to take the following steps:
The GetThisBinding concrete method of a module Environment Record […] [does this]:
- Return undefined.
In modules, the value of this
is always undefined
in the global context.
Modules are implicitly in [strict mode](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-strict-mode-
code).
3. Entering
eval code
There are two kinds of eval
calls: [direct](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-function-
calls-runtime-semantics-evaluation) and [indirect](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
eval-x). This distinction exists since the ECMAScript 5th edition.
- A direct
eval
call usually looks likeeval(
…);
or(eval)(
…);
(or((eval))(
…);
, etc.).1 It’s only direct if the call expression fits a narrow pattern.2 - An indirect
eval
call involves calling the function referenceeval
in any other way. It could beeval?.(
…)
,(
…, eval)(
…)
,window.eval(
…)
,eval.call(
…,
…)
, etc. Givenconst aliasEval1 = eval; window.aliasEval2 = eval;
, it would also bealiasEval1(
…)
,aliasEval2(
…)
. Separately, givenconst originalEval = eval; window.eval = (x) => originalEval(x);
, callingeval(
…)
would also be indirect.
See chuckj’s answer to “(1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in
JavaScript?” and [Dmitry Soshnikov’s
ECMA-262-5 in detail – Chapter 2: Strict
Mode](//dmitrysoshnikov.com/ecmascript/es5-chapter-2-strict-mode#indirect-
eval-call)
([archived](//web.archive.org/web/20210530120958/https://dmitrysoshnikov.com/ecmascript/es5-chapter-2-strict-
mode#indirect-eval-call)) for when you might use an indirect eval()
call.
PerformEval executes the eval
code. It
creates a new [declarative Environment Record](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
declarative-environment-records) as its LexicalEnvironment, which is where
GetThisEnvironment gets the
this
value from.
Then, if this
appears in eval
code, the GetThisBinding method of the
Environment Record found by [GetThisEnvironment](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
getthisenvironment) is called and its value returned.
And the created [declarative Environment Record](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
declarative-environment-records) depends on whether the eval
call was direct
or indirect:
- In a direct eval, it will be based on the current running execution context’s LexicalEnvironment.
- In an indirect eval, it will be based on the [[GlobalEnv]] property (a global Environment Record) of the Realm Record which executed the indirect eval.
Which means:
- In a direct eval, the
this
value doesn’t change; it’s taken from the lexical scope that calledeval
. - In an indirect eval, the
this
value is the global object (globalThis
).
What aboutnew Function
? — new Function
is similar to eval
, but it doesn’t call the code immediately; it creates a
function. A this binding doesn’t apply anywhere here, except when the
function is called, which works normally, as explained in the next subsection.
4. Entering
function code
Entering function code occurs when calling a function.
There are four categories of syntax to invoke a function.
- The EvaluateCall AO is performed for these three:3
- And EvaluateNew is performed for this one:3
The actual function call happens at the Call AO, which is called with a thisValue determined from context; this argument is passed along in a long chain of call-related calls. Call calls the [[[Call]]](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-function-objects-call- thisargument-argumentslist) internal slot of the function. This calls PrepareForOrdinaryCall where a new [function Environment Record](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-function- environment-records) is created:
A function Environment Record is a declarative Environment Record that is used to represent the top-level scope of a function and, if the function is not an ArrowFunction , provides a
this
binding. If a function is not an ArrowFunction function and referencessuper
, its function Environment Record also contains the state that is used to performsuper
method invocations from within the function.
In addition, there is the [[ThisValue]] field in a function Environment Record:
This is the
this
value used for this invocation of the function.
The NewFunctionEnvironment call also sets the function environment’s [[ThisBindingStatus]] property.
[[[Call]]](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-function-objects-call- thisargument-argumentslist) also calls OrdinaryCallBindThis, where the appropriate thisArgument is determined based on:
- the original reference,
- the kind of the function, and
- whether or not the code is in strict mode.
Once determined, a final call to the [BindThisValue](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec- bindthisvalue) method of the newly created function Environment Record actually sets the [[ThisValue]] field to the thisArgument.
Finally, this very field is where a function Environment
Record’s
[GetThisBinding](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-function-environment-records-
getthisbinding) AO gets the value for this
from:
The GetThisBinding concrete method of a function Environment Record envRec […] [does this]:
[…]
3. Return envRec.[[ThisValue]].
Again, how exactly the this value is determined depends on many factors; this was just a general overview. With this technical background, let’s examine all the concrete examples.
[Arrow
functions](//developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Functions/Arrow_functions)
When an [arrow function](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-runtime-semantics- instantiatearrowfunctionexpression) is evaluated, the [[ThisMode]] internal slot of the function object is set to “lexical” in OrdinaryFunctionCreate.
At OrdinaryCallBindThis, which takes a function F :
- Let thisMode be F.[[ThisMode]].
- If thisMode is lexical , return NormalCompletion(
undefined
). […]
which just means that the rest of the algorithm which binds this is skipped. An arrow function does not bind its own this value.
So, what is this
inside an arrow function, then? Looking back at
ResolveThisBinding and
GetThisEnvironment, the
[HasThisBinding method explicitly returns false](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
function-environment-records-hasthisbinding).
The HasThisBinding concrete method of a function Environment Record envRec […] [does this]:
- If envRec.[[ThisBindingStatus]] is lexical , return false ; otherwise, return true.
So the outer environment is looked up instead, iteratively. The process will end in one of the three environments that have a this binding.
This just means that, in arrow function bodies,this
comes from the lexical
scope of the arrow function, or in other words (from Arrow function vs
function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent /
exchangeable?):
Arrow functions don’t have their own
this
[…] binding. Instead, [this identifier is] resolved in the lexical scope like any other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this
[refers] to the [value ofthis
] in the environment the arrow function is defined in (i.e. “outside” the arrow function).
Function
In normal functions (function
,
methods),
this
is determined by how the function is called.
This is where these “syntax variants” come in handy.
Consider this object containing a function:
const refObj = {
func: function(){
console.log(this);
}
};
Alternatively:
const refObj = {
func(){
console.log(this);
}
};
In any of the following function calls, the this
value inside func
will be
refObj
.1
refObj.func()
refObj["func"]()
refObj?.func()
refObj.func?.()
- `refObj.func```
If the called function is syntactically a property of a base object, then this
base will be the “reference” of the call, which, in usual cases, will be the
value of this
. This is explained by the evaluation steps linked above; for
example, in refObj.func()
(or refObj["func"]()
), the
CallMemberExpression is the
entire expression refObj.func()
, which consists of the
MemberExpression refObj.func
and the Arguments ()
.
But also, refObj.func
and refObj
play three roles, each:
- they’re both expressions,
- they’re both references, and
- they’re both values.
refObj.func
as a value is the callable function object; the corresponding
reference is used to determine the this
binding.
The optional chaining and tagged template examples work very similarly:
basically, the reference is everything before the ?.()
, before the ````, or
before the ()
.
EvaluateCall uses
IsPropertyReference of that
reference to determine if it is a property of an object, syntactically. It’s
trying to get the [[Base]] property of the reference (which is e.g. refObj
,
when applied to refObj.func
; or foo.bar
when applied to foo.bar.baz
). If
it is written as a property, then [GetThisValue](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-
getthisvalue) will get this [[Base]] property and use it as the this value.
Note: Getters /
Setters
work the same way as methods, regarding this
. Simple properties don’t affect
the execution context, e.g. here, this
is in global scope:
const o = {
a: 1,
b: this.a, // Is `globalThis.a`.
[this.a]: 2 // Refers to `globalThis.a`.
};
Calls without base reference, strict mode, and
A call without a base reference is usually a function that isn’t called as a property. For example:
func(); // As opposed to `refObj.func();`.
This also happens when passing or assigning methods, or using the comma operator. This is where the difference between Reference Record and Value is relevant.
Note function j
: following the specification, you will notice that j
can
only return the function object (Value) itself, but not a Reference Record.
Therefore the base reference refObj
is lost.
const g = (f) => f(); // No base ref.
const h = refObj.func;
const j = () => refObj.func;
g(refObj.func);
h(); // No base ref.
j()(); // No base ref.
(0, refObj.func)(); // Another common pattern to remove the base ref.
EvaluateCall calls Call with a thisValue of undefined here. This makes a difference in [OrdinaryCallBindThis](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec- ordinarycallbindthis) ( F : the function object; thisArgument : the thisValue passed to Call):
- Let thisMode be F.[[ThisMode]].
[…]
- If thisMode is strict , let thisValue be thisArgument.
- Else,
- If thisArgument is undefined or null , then
- Let globalEnv be calleeRealm.[[GlobalEnv]].
- […]
- Let thisValue be globalEnv.[[GlobalThisValue]].
- Else,
- Let thisValue be ! [ToObject](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec- toobject)(thisArgument).
- NOTE: ToObject produces wrapper objects […].
[…]
Note: step 5 sets the actual value of this
to the supplied thisArgument in
strict mode — undefined
in this case. In “sloppy mode”, an undefined or null
thisArgument results in this
being the global this value.
If IsPropertyReference returns false , then EvaluateCall takes these steps:
- Let refEnv be ref.[[Base]].
- Assert: refEnv is an Environment Record.
- Let thisValue be refEnv.WithBaseObject().
This is where an undefined thisValue may come from:
refEnv.[WithBaseObject](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-object-environment-records-
withbaseobject)() is always undefined , except in
with
statements. In this case, thisValue will be the binding object.
There’s also Symbol.unscopables
(Docs on
MDN)
to control the with
binding behavior.
To summarize, so far:
function f1(){
console.log(this);
}
function f2(){
console.log(this);
}
function f3(){
console.log(this);
}
const o = {
f1,
f2,
[Symbol.unscopables]: {
f2: true
}
};
f1(); // Logs `globalThis`.
with(o){
f1(); // Logs `o`.
f2(); // `f2` is unscopable, so this logs `globalThis`.
f3(); // `f3` is not on `o`, so this logs `globalThis`.
}
and:
"use strict";
function f(){
console.log(this);
}
f(); // Logs `undefined`.
// `with` statements are not allowed in strict-mode code.
Note that when evaluating this
, it doesn’t matter where a normal
function is defined.
.call
,
.apply
,
.bind
,
thisArg , and primitives
Another consequence of step 5 of OrdinaryCallBindThis, in conjunction with step 6.2 (6.b in the spec), is that a primitive this value is coerced to an object only in “sloppy” mode.
To examine this, let’s introduce another source for the this value: the three methods that override the this binding:4
Function.prototype.apply(thisArg, argArray)
Function.prototype.
{call
,bind
}(thisArg, ...args)
.bind
creates a bound
function, whose this binding is set to thisArg and cannot change again.
.call
and
.apply
call the function
immediately, with the this binding set to thisArg.
.call
and .apply
map directly to Call,
using the specified thisArg. .bind
creates a bound function with
BoundFunctionCreate. These have
their own [[[Call]] method](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-bound-function-exotic-
objects-call-thisargument-argumentslist) which looks up the function object’s
[[BoundThis]] internal slot.
Examples of setting a custom this value:
function f(){
console.log(this);
}
const myObj = {},
g = f.bind(myObj),
h = (m) => m();
// All of these log `myObj`.
g();
f.bind(myObj)();
f.call(myObj);
h(g);
For objects, this is the same in strict and non-strict mode.
Now, try to supply a primitive value:
function f(){
console.log(this);
}
const myString = "s",
g = f.bind(myString);
g(); // Logs `String { "s" }`.
f.call(myString); // Logs `String { "s" }`.
In non-strict mode, primitives are coerced to their object-wrapped form. It’s
the same kind of object you get when calling Object("s")
or new String("s")
. In strict mode, you can use primitives:
"use strict";
function f(){
console.log(this);
}
const myString = "s",
g = f.bind(myString);
g(); // Logs `"s"`.
f.call(myString); // Logs `"s"`.
Libraries make use of these methods, e.g. jQuery sets the this
to the DOM
element selected here:
$("button").click(function(){
console.log(this); // Logs the clicked button.
});
Constructors,
When calling a function as a constructor using the new
operator,
EvaluateNew calls
Construct, which calls the [[[Construct]]
method](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-function-objects-construct-
argumentslist-newtarget). If the function is a base constructor (i.e. not a
class extends
…{
…}
), it sets thisArgument to a new object created from
the constructor’s prototype. Properties set on this
in the constructor will
end up on the resulting instance object. this
is implicitly returned, unless
you explicitly return your own non-primitive value.
A class
is a new way of creating
constructor functions, introduced in ECMAScript 2015.
function Old(a){
this.p = a;
}
const o = new Old(1);
console.log(o); // Logs `Old { p: 1 }`.
class New{
constructor(a){
this.p = a;
}
}
const n = new New(1);
console.log(n); // Logs `New { p: 1 }`.
Class definitions are implicitly in [strict mode](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec- strict-mode-code):
class A{
m1(){
return this;
}
m2(){
const m1 = this.m1;
console.log(m1());
}
}
new A().m2(); // Logs `undefined`.
The exception to the behavior with new
is class extends
…{
…}
, as
mentioned above. Derived classes do not immediately set their this value
upon invocation; they only do so once the base class is reached through a
series of super
calls (happens implicitly without an own constructor
).
Using this
before calling super
is not allowed.
Calling [super
](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-super-keyword-runtime-semantics-
evaluation) calls the super constructor with the this value of the lexical
scope (the function Environment Record) of the call.
GetThisValue has a special rule for
super
calls. It uses BindThisValue
to set this
to that Environment Record.
class DerivedNew extends New{
constructor(a, a2){
// Using `this` before `super` results in a ReferenceError.
super(a);
this.p2 = a2;
}
}
const n2 = new DerivedNew(1, 2);
console.log(n2); // Logs `DerivedNew { p: 1, p2: 2 }`.
5. Evaluating class fields
Instance fields and static fields were introduced in ECMAScript 2022.
When a class
is evaluated,
[ClassDefinitionEvaluation](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-runtime-semantics-
classdefinitionevaluation) is performed, modifying the running execution
context. For each
ClassElement:
- if a field is static, then
this
refers to the class itself, - if a field is not static, then
this
refers to the instance.
Private fields (e.g. #x
) and methods are added to a PrivateEnvironment.
Static blocks are currently a
TC39 stage 3 proposal. Static blocks work the
same as static fields and methods: this
inside them refers to the class
itself.
Note that in methods and getters / setters, this
works just like in normal
function properties.
class Demo{
a = this;
b(){
return this;
}
static c = this;
static d(){
return this;
}
// Getters, setters, private modifiers are also possible.
}
const demo = new Demo;
console.log(demo.a, demo.b()); // Both log `demo`.
console.log(Demo.c, Demo.d()); // Both log `Demo`.
1: (o.f)()
is equivalent to o.f()
; (f)()
is equivalent to f()
. This is
explained in this 2ality article
(archived).
Particularly see how a ParenthesizedExpression is
evaluated.
2: It must be a MemberExpression , must not be a property, must have a [[ReferencedName]] of exactly "eval" , and must be the %eval% intrinsic object.
3: Whenever the specification says “Let ref be the result of evaluating X.”, then X is some expression that you need to find the evaluation steps for. For example, evaluating a [MemberExpression](//tc39.es/ecma262/#prod- MemberExpression) or [CallExpression](//tc39.es/ecma262/#prod- CallExpression) is the result of one of [these algorithms](//tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-property-accessors-runtime-semantics- evaluation). Some of them result in a Reference Record.
4: There are also several other native and host methods that allow providing a
this value, notably Array.prototype.map
, Array.prototype.forEach
, etc.
that accept a thisArg as their second argument. Anyone can make their own
methods to alter this
like (func, thisArg) => func.bind(thisArg)
, (func, thisArg) => func.call(thisArg)
, etc. As always,
MDN offers great
documentation.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
For each code snippet, answer the question: “What is the value ofthis
at
the marked line? Why?”.
To reveal the answers, click the gray boxes.
-
console.log(this); // What isif(true){
this
here? }
globalThis
. The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
-
const obj = {};
function myFun(){
return { // What is `this` here?
"is obj": this === obj,
"is globalThis": this === globalThis
};
}
obj.method = myFun;
console.log(obj.method());
obj
. When calling a function as a property of an object, it is called with the this binding set to the base of the referenceobj.method
, i.e.obj
.
-
myMethod: function(){ return { // What isconst obj = {
this
here? "is obj": this === obj, "is globalThis": this === globalThis }; } }, myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log(myFun());
globalThis
. Since the function valuemyFun
/obj.myMethod
is not called off of an object, as a property, the this binding will beglobalThis
. This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (obj.myMethod
) creates a bound method object.
-
myFun: () => ({ // What isconst obj = {
this
here? "is obj": this === obj, "is globalThis": this === globalThis }) };
console.log(obj.myFun());
globalThis
. Arrow functions don’t create their own this binding. The lexical scope is the same as the initial global scope, sothis
isglobalThis
.
-
console.log(this); // What isfunction myFun(){
this
here? }
const obj = {
myMethod: function(){
eval("myFun()");
}
};
obj.myMethod();
globalThis
. When evaluating the direct eval call,this
isobj
. However, in the eval code,myFun
is not called off of an object, so the this binding is set to the global object.
-
// What isfunction myFun() {
this
here? return { "is obj": this === obj, "is globalThis": this === globalThis }; }
const obj = {};
console.log(myFun.call(obj));
obj
. The linemyFun.call(obj);
is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call
, which acceptsthisArg
as the first argument.
-
arrow = () => ({ // What isclass MyCls{
this
here? "is MyCls": this === MyCls, "is globalThis": this === globalThis, "is instance": this instanceof MyCls }); }
console.log(new MyCls().arrow());
It’s the instance of
MyCls
. Arrow functions don’t change the this binding, so it comes from lexical scope. Therefore, this is exactly the same as with the class fields mentioned above, likea = this;
. Try changing it tostatic arrow
. Do you get the result you expect?